Skip to main content

Top 100 Cities in the U.S. Ranked by the Economic Value of Solar Power

Top 100 Cities in the U.S. Ranked by the Economic Value of Solar Power


City     Solar Value Index
Honolulu, HI    $ 2,368
San Diego, CA    $ 1,387
Chula Vista, CA    $ 1,387
Bakersfield, CA    $ 1,367
Los Angeles, CA    $ 1,365
Fresno, CA    $ 1,360
Long Beach, CA    $ 1,346
Anaheim, CA    $ 1,346
Santa Ana, CA    $ 1,346
Riverside, CA    $ 1,346
Irvine, CA    $ 1,346
San Bernardino, CA    $ 1,346
San Jose, CA    $ 1,342
San Francisco, CA    $ 1,342
Oakland, CA    $ 1,342
Fremont, CA    $ 1,342
Boston, MA    $ 1,327
Sacramento, CA    $ 1,312
Stockton, CA    $ 1,312
New York, NY    $ 1,192
Las Vegas, NV    $ 1,143
Henderson, NV    $ 1,143
North Las Vegas, NV    $ 1,143
Albuquerque, NM    $ 1,127
Buffalo, NY    $ 1,118
Tucson, AZ    $ 1,080
Reno, NV    $ 1,058
Phoenix, AZ    $ 1,053
Mesa, AZ    $ 1,053
Chandler, AZ    $ 1,053
Gilbert town, AZ    $ 1,053
Glendale, AZ    $ 1,053
Scottsdale, AZ    $ 1,053
El Paso, TX    $ 1,046
Newark, NJ    $ 1,033
Jersey City, NJ    $ 1,033
Milwaukee, WI    $ 972
Madison, WI    $ 968
Lubbock, TX    $ 967
Colorado Springs, CO    $ 963
Baltimore, MD    $ 952
Wichita, KS    $ 943
Philadelphia, PA    $ 929
Denver, CO    $ 927
Aurora, CO    $ 927
Detroit, MI    $ 922
Dallas, TX    $ 897
Fort Worth, TX    $ 897
Arlington, TX    $ 897
Plano, TX    $ 897
Garland, TX    $ 897
Irving, TX    $ 897
Washington, DC    $ 893
Anchorage, AK    $ 893
San Antonio, TX    $ 889
Tampa, FL    $ 884
Orlando, FL    $ 884
St. Petersburg, FL    $ 884
Austin, TX    $ 876
Miami, FL    $ 874
Hialeah, FL    $ 874
Pittsburgh, PA    $ 867
Minneapolis, MN    $ 851
St. Paul, MN    $ 851
Atlanta, GA    $ 843
Jacksonville, FL    $ 836
Cincinnati, OH    $ 835
Toledo, OH    $ 830
Charlotte, NC    $ 822
Raleigh, NC    $ 820
Durham, NC    $ 820
Chicago, IL    $ 820
Greensboro, NC    $ 817
Winston-Salem, NC    $ 817
Corpus Christi, TX    $ 814
Laredo, TX    $ 814
Columbus, OH    $ 799
Virginia Beach, VA    $ 795
Norfolk, VA    $ 795
Chesapeake, VA    $ 795
Houston, TX    $ 793
Richmond, VA    $ 789
Kansas City, MO    $ 788
Cleveland, OH    $ 786
Oklahoma City, OK    $ 781
Omaha, NE    $ 771
Lincoln, NE    $ 771
St. Louis, MO    $ 767
Indianapolis, IN    $ 764
Memphis, TN    $ 764
Boise City, ID    $ 743
Tulsa, OK    $ 738
Nashville-Davidson, TN    $ 731
Fort Wayne, IN    $ 731
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY    $ 694
Lexington-Fayette, KY    $ 680
New Orleans, LA    $ 654
Baton Rouge, LA    $ 642
Portland, OR    $ 620
Seattle, WA    $ 507

Via sunmetrix.com
Labels:

This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Find cities with similar climate

This map has been created using The Global environmental stratification. The Global environmental stratification (GEnS), based on statistical clustering of bioclimate data (WorldClim). GEnS, consists of 125 strata, which have been aggregated into 18 global environmental zones (labeled A to R) based on the dendrogram. Interactive map >> Via www.vividmaps.com Related posts: -  Find cities with similar climate 2050 -  How global warming will impact 6000+ cities around the world?
Read more

The Appalachian Mountains, the Scottish Highlands, and the Atlas Mounts in Africa were the same mountain range

The Central Pangean Mountains was a prominent mountain ridge in the central part of the supercontinent Pangaea that extends across the continent from northeast to southwest through the Carboniferous , Permian Triassic periods. The mountains were formed due to a collision within the supercontinents Gondwana and Laurussia during the creation of Pangaea. It was comparable to the present Himalayas at its highest peak during the start of the Permian period. It isn’t easy to assume now that once upon a time that the Scottish Highlands, The Appalachian Mountains, the Ouachita Mountain Range, and the Atlas Mountains in northwestern Africa are the same mountains , once connected as the Central Pangean Mountains.
Post a Comment
Read more

Moose population in North America

The moose population in North America is shrinking swiftly. This decrease has been correlated to the opening of roadways and landscapes into this animal's north range.   In North America, the moose range includes almost all of Canada and Alaska, the northern part of New England and New York, the upper Rocky Mountains, northern Minnesota and Wisconsin, Michigan's Upper Peninsula, and Isle Royale.    In 2014-2015, the North American moose population was measured at around one million animals. The most abundant moose population (about 700,000) lives in Canada. About 300 000 moose remains in nineteen U.S. states Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. The largest moose specimens are found in Alaska 200 thousand moose. Below the map shows the size of US states scaled by the moose population.     Via www.vividmaps.com
Read more