Skip to main content

Women May Need Less Time Exercising Than Men to Lower Heart Risk

A new study found that women with no history of heart disease can decrease their risk of disease with about half as much exercise as men. 
Sport activity: Men vs Women

A new analysis of wrist-worn activity trackers and medical records from the UK Biobank looked at more than 85,000 adults and followed them for several years; the headline result is simple: in this sample women reached the same drop in coronary heart disease risk with far fewer minutes of moderate activity per week than men — roughly 250 minutes for women versus about 530 minutes for men to get a similar ~30% reduction.

That sounds surprising until you remember two things: first, the study used objective device data (not self-reported exercise) collected in the UK Biobank project, which makes the activity measures more reliable than surveys; and second, biological differences (hormones, body composition, how tissues respond to exercise) can affect how a given “dose” of activity changes risk. The study authors and multiple news outlets emphasize that the findings are associations from observational data — they don’t mean that all men must race to gym-heavy routines, but they do suggest sex-specific responses to the same activity level.

Why exercise helps the heart: aerobic activity strengthens the heart’s pumping ability, helps reduce blood pressure, lowers inflammation, and boosts “good” HDL cholesterol — mechanisms that cut coronary risk across sexes even if the size of the benefit differs. Public health groups still recommend around 150 minutes of moderate activity per week as a baseline; this new analysis suggests that for extra coronary protection some people — on average, men in this sample — may need to push past that baseline to reach the same relative benefit.

Practical, everyday reading of the results: if your life’s schedule is jam-packed, it’s reassuring to know that steady, moderate movement really matters and that the minutes you do get are not wasted. Aim for the common baseline (about 150 minutes/week) and, where possible, build toward higher weekly totals — for many women in the study, around 250 minutes/week was linked with large reductions in coronary events, while men in the same dataset, on average, needed more minutes to hit the same relative effect. If you already have coronary disease or other medical issues, the study’s subgroup analyses suggest exercise is still beneficial but talk to your clinician about safe targets and progressions. (Nature; press summaries). 

How to make those minutes fit, without a gym membership: split activity into short chunks (10–20 minute brisk walks during breaks), swap car trips for bike rides where feasible, take stairs, walk meetings, or add a quick session of higher-effort intervals once or twice a week. These are low-cost choices that cut household transport emissions and increase active minutes at the same time — a small nudge for personal health and for sustainable daily travel. For tracking, a basic wrist activity tracker or a phone app will give you a reliable sense of weekly minutes so you can set realistic, incremental goals.

Amazon resources (these links go to Amazon’s site)

This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Find cities with similar climate

This map has been created using The Global environmental stratification. The Global environmental stratification (GEnS), based on statistical clustering of bioclimate data (WorldClim). GEnS, consists of 125 strata, which have been aggregated into 18 global environmental zones (labeled A to R) based on the dendrogram. Interactive map >> Via www.vividmaps.com Related posts: -  Find cities with similar climate 2050 -  How global warming will impact 6000+ cities around the world?

Mapping the Hottest Temperatures Ever Recorded on Earth

 When summer arrives, it brings not only vacation season but also some of the most extreme heat waves across the globe. While many people associate summer with warm, sunny days, some regions endure scorching temperatures that push the limits of human endurance. To put these extremes into perspective, we’ve mapped the highest temperatures ever recorded in countries around the world. The maps below, created by Vivid Maps , illustrate these record-breaking temperatures and the patterns of extreme heat across the globe. The Hottest Temperature on Record According to historical weather data, the highest reliably recorded temperature on Earth is 56.7°C (134°F) , measured in Death Valley, California , on July 10, 1913 . However, an even higher temperature of 58°C (136.4°F) was reportedly recorded in El Azizia, Libya , on September 13, 1922 . While this Libyan record stood for decades, some meteorologists have questioned its accuracy due to inconsistencies in measurement methods at the ti...

How Cold Can It Get? The Lowest Temperatures Ever Recorded, Mapped

We often talk about record heat , especially in the context of climate change. But on the flip side, our planet also experiences cold so extreme it defies belief—temperatures that can flash-freeze exposed skin and halt life as we know it. These are not just numbers on thermometers; they’re snapshots of how Earth's atmosphere behaves under specific conditions—altitude, wind patterns, and location far from the moderating effects of oceans. The coldest temperature ever recorded on Earth? That title goes to Vostok Station in Antarctica, where scientists measured a bone-cracking −89.2°C (−128.6°F) on July 21, 1983. Located on the East Antarctic Plateau, Vostok is more than 1,000 kilometers from the South Pole and sits atop about 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles) of ice. It’s isolated, dry, and high—three ingredients that make for perfect deep freeze conditions. The world map below created by VividMaps shows the lowest temperature ever recorded by country. The Coldest Inhabited Place on Earth...