Skip to main content

Mapping Indonesia’s fires and logging rights

Kalimantan: Remaining forest cover (green), palm oil concessions (blue), coal mining (purple), forest fires over the past 12 months (orange dots).
Kalimantan: Remaining forest cover (green), palm oil concessions (blue), coal mining (purple), forest fires over the past 12 months (orange dots).

Indonesia’s logging and plantation rights, fire hotspots and deforestation alerts will be mapped as a result of an ongoing Greenpeace Indonesia investigation into one of the world’s most fragile ecosystems.

The new interactive map comes shortly after the Indonesian province of Riau was forced to declare a state of emergency as fires returned to the region in 2016.

Forest fires in Indonesia – often linked to deforestation – have been branded the worst environmental disaster of 2015, with widespread impacts on air pollution and climate change.

The interactive map of company concession information in Indonesian forests – and how it relates to peatlands, fire hotspots and deforestation alerts – has just been published online.

Orangutan habitats

The map brings together data on concessions held by logging, palm oil, pulp and mining companies.

As well as the concessions data, the map displays areas of primary and secondary forest, orangutan and tiger habitat, peatland and live fire and deforestation alerts.

East Kalimantan: Orangutan habitat (yellow areas) and forest fires so far in 2016 (orange dots)
East Kalimantan: Orangutan habitat (yellow areas) and forest fires so far in 2016 (orange dots)

Indonesia’s swampy peatlands are an important carbon sink holding an estimated 60 gigatons of CO2 – equivalent to more than six years of global emissions from fossil fuels.

Following the extensive 2015 forest fires – which cost Indonesia an estimated US$16.1 billion – Indonesian President Joko Widodo announced new plans to restore the land and prevent further fires.

In an average year landscape fires cause an estimated 110,000 premature deaths across southeast Asia – and 2015’s fires were much worse than the years used to model those impacts.

The fires were partly fuelled by forest clearance and peatland drainage by palm oil and pulpwood companies.

Live data for for firefighting

The open source map – produced by Greenpeace Indonesia using open source technology provided by Global Forest Watch – also shows daily active fire information from NASA’s Fire Information for Resource Management System.

Just last week a state of emergency was declared after further fires were detected in Riau province in eastern Sumatra. Riau has a lot of peat cover, pulpwood and palm oil plantations.

Peat cover (brown, see key for depth) and fires (orange/red dots) in Riau province this week
Peat cover (brown, see key for depth) and fires (orange/red dots) in Riau province this week

The government’s pledges to protect Indonesians against fire are dependent on the protection and restoration of peatlands by concession holders.

Companies wanting to convert forested peatland for palm oil plantations first cut canals to drain the peat before clearing the trees for planting – after which the dry peatland is much more likely to catch fire.

Mapping concessions, fire and deforestation alerts

The Indonesian government has stated its commitment to preventing further fires like those of late 2015.

And the international community has also provided incentives for Indonesia to control deforestation: In 2010 Norway offered Indonesia $1 billion, a part of which was the One Map Initiative.

Despite this, and the establishment of a national peat restoration agency, progress has been slow – and only $60m has been handed over.

One of the problems is the lack of baseline data – the Indonesian government’s most recent published maps are from 2014. Without accurate data, attempts to protect the forests are likely to fail.

Central Kalimantan, November 2015
Central Kalimantan, November 2015

Breaking the deadlock

Companies also recognise that accurate maps are crucial to fight fires and restore burnt areas.

Making data more accessible means buyers – such as firms which make consumer products – can check which concessions are thought to be held by which company.

The tool is still a work in progress and it is hoped that palm oil companies will come forward to provide more accurate details on their concession areas whilst the Indonesian government is under pressure to release all the data it holds in line with its commitments to the One Map initiative.


This post may contain affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.


Popular posts from this blog

Find cities with similar climate

This map has been created using The Global environmental stratification. The Global environmental stratification (GEnS), based on statistical clustering of bioclimate data (WorldClim). GEnS, consists of 125 strata, which have been aggregated into 18 global environmental zones (labeled A to R) based on the dendrogram. Interactive map >> Via Related posts: -  Find cities with similar climate 2050 -  How global warming will impact 6000+ cities around the world?

The Appalachian Mountains, the Scottish Highlands, and the Atlas Mounts in Africa were the same mountain range

The Central Pangean Mountains was a prominent mountain ridge in the central part of the supercontinent Pangaea that extends across the continent from northeast to southwest through the Carboniferous , Permian Triassic periods. The mountains were formed due to a collision within the supercontinents Gondwana and Laurussia during the creation of Pangaea. It was comparable to the present Himalayas at its highest peak during the start of the Permian period. It isn’t easy to assume now that once upon a time that the Scottish Highlands, The Appalachian Mountains, the Ouachita Mountain Range, and the Atlas Mountains in northwestern Africa are the same mountains , once connected as the Central Pangean Mountains.

Human Emotions Visualized

Despite significant diversity in the culture around the globe, humanity's DNA is 99.9 percent alike. There are some characteristics more primary and typical to the human experience than our emotions. Of course, the large spectrum of emotions we can feel can be challenging to verbalize. That's where this splendid visualization by the Junto Institute comes in. This visualization is the newest in an ongoing attempt to categorize the full range of emotions logically. Our knowledge has come a long route since William James suggested 4 primary emotions: fear, grief, love, and rage. These kernel emotions yet form much of the basis for current frameworks. The Junto Institute's visualization above classifies 6 basic emotions: fear, anger, sadness, surprise, joy, love More nuanced descriptions begin from these 6 primary emotions, such as jealousy as a subset of anger and awe-struck as a subset of surprise. As a result, there are 102 second-and third-order emotions placed on this emo